Michael Riley: Providence Vying for Worst Funded City in America
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Last week, Moody’s Credit Rating Agency, using new metrics that should surprise no one, unceremoniously dropped Chicago three notches to BAA1. This is three levels above junk and affects $8 billion in GO (General Obligation Bond) debt. Similarly, Providence is also rated BAA1 but that was done in September 2013 prior to Moody’s change in methodology and after Providence’s mild reform effort. The difference between Mayor Taveras of Providence and Rahm Emanuel as individuals is obvious. One mayor is aggressively seeks a solution to an impending calamity and the other Mayor tinkered, caved to union demands and is done, thereby dooming Providence to receivership. Mayor Emanuel thinks the city of Chicago is in dire straits, is pushing the unions, and is looking for solutions. Mayor Taveras has fooled around with the accounting; made the laughably courageous call to end 6% COLAs (Cost of Living Adjustments) and now now everything is fine.
From Moody’s perspective, they both have ratings that fairly “reflect the city’s massive and growing unfunded pension liabilities, which threaten the city’s fiscal solvency absent major revenue and other budgetary adjustments adopted in the near term and sustained for years to come.”
Mayor Emanuel has resorted to taxable bonds for funding the city and Providence’s next Mayor may adopt this tactic. But unless both cities can significantly renegotiate the contracts with their respective unions soon and raise taxes, they both have very few options other than Bankruptcy or receivership.
Did Providence mislead bondholders and citizens?
In Providence there is an additional issue of answering charges that Providence has mislead bondholders and citizens by false and inflated reporting of assets in the pension plan. We were the first in the country to expose this and we are awaiting an answer. Calls to Segal, who recommended Providence discontinue their practice in the audit produced a few weeks ago, have not been returned. We have studied hundreds of cities nationwide, especially poorly funded pension plans and have been unable to find similar asset treatment that used by Providence officials and their accountants.
In July 2013, Miami and its former budget director were charged with securities fraud related to several municipal bond offerings. The SEC alleged that misleading financial information was given to investors. My readings of the last few reports from Providence to its citizens and to the RI Municipal Pension Study Commission show that their numbers will require significant changes to comply with regulators and ratings agencies. Pensions and accounting can no longer be swept under the rug. Providence will have to explain its accounting treatment for assets in the plan and why the auditor told them just a few weeks ago, to end those accounting practices.
An interesting battle in Coventry
Rhode Island has already begun implementing an interesting municipal incentive program known as RIGL 45-13.2-5 and 2-6. This program seeks to reward good behavior in pension management by localities. Coventry believes it deserves its share of “incentive”, approximately $166,000 out of a $5 million program. The idea of the program is to encourage local pension plans to reform and/or join the state pension system. Coventry’s Town Council and town manager argue that the dispute over the $20 million of liability in non-certified school employees should not affect this aid. The town believes the liability and the lack of solution are the schools problem and not the town’s problem. The town has been contributing their required amount for decades. The interesting juxtaposition of funding responsibilities and obligations has created quite a stir and the town of Coventry believes that the state and revenue director may be acting “unlawfully” by withholding aid from Coventry. Coventry claims it is the only town that has had aid withheld. This is especially surprising considering the wide range of compliance and talks associated with Funding Improvement Plans.
From Coventry Town manager Thomas Hoover:
Mr. Hoover said it is very curious to the town that the Town of Coventry is the “only one” in the State of Rhode Island that this has been withheld from. He said the town is working on this issue; however he cannot say that the town is at a conclusion on their discussions, but they are continuing to talk. Mr. Hoover said as you can see from his letter, he is hopeful that the Department of Revenue and the Governor changes their position on the municipal aid since the town is adamantly against the action that was taken, and he said “it not only is it unfair, but the town believes it is unlawful.
While this is all very interesting, it doesn’t change the math and Coventry will be unlikely to make it to year-end 2014 without a receiver. The town awaits a huge arbitration ruling on a police contract that may render this whole discussion mute and trigger bankruptcy. We should know by the end of this month. In addition, the town understates its liabilities by about $64 million. We show Coventry’s Unfunded Pension Liability as $134,000,000 using Moody’s and GASB 2014 metrics. We also have not included the effects of the liability of CCFD liquidation, which is in the tens of millions.
Coventry's Unfunded Pension Liability
Source: http://www.muni-info.ri.gov/documents/Pension-Study-Commission/2014.1.27%20PSC%20Minutes%20Package.pdf " target="_blank">Pension and OPEB Study Commission
In addition, Mr. Hoover said it is very curious that the Town of Coventry is the “only one” in Rhode Island that this has been withheld from. He said the town is working on this issue; however he cannot say that the town is at a conclusion on their discussions, but they are continuing to talk. Mr. Hoover said, as you can see from his letter, he is hopeful that the Department of Revenue and the Governor changes their position on the municipal aid since the town is adamantly against the action that was taken. He also said, “it not only is it unfair, but the town believes it is unlawful.”
Related Slideshow: Providence Pension Liability
A new report shows that Providence’s pension fund—even after the recent reform—is still in trouble. The below slides break out the key numbers for the pension fund, including the unfunded liability, the assumed and actual rates of return, the current level of benefits, and how long it will take the city to pay off the unfunded liability. Figures are current as of July 1, 2013 and are taken from the new Jan. 31 actuarial report from Segal Consulting.
Impact of Lower Rates of Return
$72 million:The city unfunded liability increased by this amount when the city lowered its assumed rate of return by a quarter of a percentage point, from 8.5% to 8.25%
$506.2 million: The estimated increase in the unfunded liability were the city to use the 6% assumed rate of return recommended by Moody’s Investors Service.
Current Cost of Pension Fund
City Contribution: $58.1 million
Employees Contribution: $10.9 million
Net Investment Return: $18.1 million
Cost of Retiree Benefits: $95.4 million
Note: Net investment return is the return on investments after investment and administrative fees have been paid.
- Michael Riley: Analysing A Crisis
- Experts React to Rhode Island Pension Reform Agreement
- Michael Riley: Is the RI Pension Commission Making Up Numbers?
- Providence Pension Crisis by the Numbers
- Michael Riley: The Harsh Reality of the Pension and OPEB Crisis
- See How Much Providence Pays in Pension Fund Fees
- Michael Riley: The Municipal Pension Study Commission Is A Failure
- Michael Riley: The Pension Study Commission Needs To Face Reality
- Michael Riley: West Warwick Is Headed For Disaster
- PowerPlayer: Republican Congressional Candidate Michael Riley
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Michael Riley: Rhode Island’s Leadership Problem
- EXCLUSIVE: Providence Unfunded Pension Liability Now At Least $831M